"Cosmopolitan Canopy" and Cosmopolitanism

I feel like Appiah and Anderson share several similar views on being a "cosmopolitan", and what it takes to fully understand another person's culture. Both discuss how there must be a sense of trust created between the two different people so that they can feel comfortable with one another, and be able to share concepts. While under the "cosmopolitan canopy" a person can feel comfortable acting as a cosmopolitan, where if they were outside the canopy, they would not feel as comfortable. 

Appiah also talked about the idea of "imaginary strangers", I feel like Anderson touches this topic in his article as well. Anderson talks about the different types of interactions that people have and I think that the "impersonal/ threatening" type of interaction between strangers is a direct correlation to Appiah's idea of "imaginary strangers".  Imaginary strangers are people who act differently than you had initially thought that they would act. This relates to Anderson's interaction because with the threatening interaction, one generally makes a judgement on how they think a person is by the way they carry themselves and the way they look- and then decide if they appear to be threatening or not. When a person makes an immediate judgement without getting to know a person for who they really are, then they are not being a very good cosmopolitan.  

I think that the best cosmopolitains are the people who constantly feel like they are under a canopy, they always feel comfortable interacting. We need to work on making cosmopolitan canopies much larger as a whole- people should be able to interact constructively with people from pretty much any culture and be able to feel like it is ok to ask questions.

Cosmopolitan Canopy

I agree with Anderson's "cosmopolitan canopy" idea of being important. We discussed several of these ideas and concepts in class today. I agree because I think that to truly understand a culture you have to be comfortable to ask the important questions about the culture. Also in a "cosmopolitan canopy" a person will observe in three different ways, as impersonal or threatening, neutral or intimate.  While observing a culture a person will probably deal with all of these scenarios.  

In Anderson's conclusion he is very careful about his use of vocabulary, as we discussed in class. Our professor brought up that in Anderson's conclusion he says "This kind of  exposure to a multitude of people engaging in everyday behavior often humanizes abstract strangers in the minds of these observers." from the article "Cosmopolitan Canopy".  During class we discussed the word "exposed". I brought up the idea of how the word exposed has a connotation of being vulnerable. I think that the idea of being vulnerable is key to learning about other cultures. To truly understand a culture you have to open yourself up others to create a level of trust so that they will open up to you. Also the place where you would be vulnerable is under the "cosmopolitan canopy". 

SL vs. RL (Second Life vs. Real Life)

I feel like when meeting strangers there are several routes to take. A person can be openly friendly, and very outgoing and charming; or a person can be very closed off and appear to be cold; or a person could react in a very shy but polite way. There are several ways to respond while meeting someone for the first time. It also depends on who your meeting. If you are meeting some average joe next door you might not get excited or be as open to meeting that guy and getting to know him. On the other hand if you were to meet someone who you find very attractive, the friendliness will probably sway the other way, and you would probably be much more open to getting to know that person. This seems a little ridiculous, but it is true, people still judge other people by the way they look on the outside. You would think that since we have come so far with our own evolution that we could be able to move past appearances and look past that into peoples hearts. No matter how hard we try I feel like it is almost impossible to actually be able to not judge someone by the way they look or act, simply because it is our nature to associate certain characteristics with certain ideals in our mind. You may not judge someone solely on there appearance, but as soon as you meet that person you probably associate that person with a certain memory or maybe even another person from your life. I believe that this act is done sub-consciencely. You can't help you experiences and memories nor should you ever. You are able to remember people that you can immediately find a bond with easier, so that is how people work, we remember by association, it's not always bad. 

I think that people in real life are much more quicker to judge completely based on appearance. People in SL have a much more different take on the world because you can choose to look like whatever you want in SL, whereas in real life you are slightly limited. I have also found that people in SL are generally much more welcoming than the average stranger.  I feel like as a SL community, they very supportive of one another, and generally want the best for people and the community. I think people in real life are to fixed on helping themselves get better without much thought for the community growing as a whole. I feel like that is the main difference between SL and real life.  

SL compared to BAFA BAFA

SL was a much more different situation than situation that I experienced in SL.  While we did the SL the interaction with strangers was much more inviting and when there was a conflict in different languages. When we were in SL we were able to talk to people of many different countries, which then had different languages. There was a translator available when necessary. Whereas in the BAFA BAFA game there was no translator to serve as a crutch to aid in the new environment. The BAFA BAFA game an outsider was left alone to try to win over the new people of the new culture without and aid. In SL I think that there are many more people there who are willing to help, in comparison the BAFA BAFA game were much more hostile. There are plenty of friendly people to help you learn more about SL in SL. SL has a friendly vibe, but that is just where I went, some people had other experiences. Some people experienced the same response from the BAFA BAFA game as in SL. I feel like that is a more rare case, most of the groups that presented the place that they went to seemed to have a similar experience to me. I think that the BAFA BAFA game and SL situations can be taken like going anywhere new in real life, you just never really know how people are going to react. I think all three scenarios are very relatable because they are all dealing with human contact, even though your on the computer in SL you are still talking to real people.

Compare SL islands

So we have gone through a couple presentations in class on other SL Islands and cultures. I feel like they all share several similarities and differences no matter which place you travel to. No matter where you go there is a sense of belonging to each community after you have put some time into exploring that island. Now even though I am not part of the SL Amsterdam group, I still feel like I am part of the SL Amsterdam culture. I have experienced trying to make money in Amsterdam by being a "camper", and even helping someone who was new to SL try to learn their way around the island.  

However the people that are on the island severely differ. The most people in SL Amsterdam are pretty forward with their conversations, and actions. As an observer you can tell just by the way that they are dressed that they are very outgoing and sometimes overly friendly. Also they differ completely from other islands who are less forward like SL Mexico (according to the group that explored the island). I was never insulted in Amsterdam, but my friend who explored Mexico tell a much different story with his experiences interacting with people from Mexico. I find this interesting because the people that are on these islands are not all from a certain area, they come from all over the world, so there is no way to really group the person who is insulting someone to a type of person. Even though avatars represent who you are, you can choose to be anyone you want. This brings up another point of how can you insult someone on how they dress in SL? This makes no sense to me, how can you be o materialistic on SL? SL is a place for people to explore, this should be an inviting place, but this also brings up the dress code that is on another island. 

SL is full of rules, just like real life. You can either go some place with a lot of rules or somewhere with very little rules.  The possibilities are endless in SL.

Passage #2

The second passage from Cosmopolitanism is 

"The conclusion is obvious enough: the points of entry to cross-cultural conversations are things that are shared by those who are in the conversation. They do not need to be universal; all they need to be is what these particular people have in common. Once we have found enough we share, there is the further possibility that we will be able to enjoy discovering things we do not yet share." (pg. 97)

This quote embodies what I feel is how people become friends- until you find a common ground with a stranger, it is kind of hard to become closer. Finding a similarity between two strangers creates a link, that two people can then build a relationship out of. It is a building block, if you will. As a freshman at UK I have found that the people that I can make an immediate connection with are the ones that I have become the closest to. However the people that I have found immediate common ground with are also very culturally different. I have met people who come from other states, divorced parents, married parents, gays, whoever, but since we made that first connection we have been able to explore our differences and have become closer friends for it. I feel like the quote above speaks for pretty much every person, not just freshmen, it is easier to become friends with someone once you find common ground then you begin to feel more comfortable and a level of trust is created, then you can discuss each other's differences with respect. 

Plus if everyone was the same that would be really lame and no one would really have anything good to talk about.  Then everyone would become "universal", which would be the worst thing to become, it would be like just having a bunch of little clones around with no personality! eww! But the world is not like that (thank god!), so people have plenty to talk about and discus.  

Talking to people from different cultures also makes you appreciate all the little things from home that aren't at college. For example: my family is pretty big and we are all really close, and we would pretty much have a family get together every month, and being away at school I miss the family interaction. I love it here, and I am so glad that I am here, but I do miss that great food, and of course the family! It is interesting to find out other people's family traditions.

SL Discovering

So the International Back Line is exploring the SL version of Amsterdam! It is a very exciting place to explore. There are several places to go and interesting people to meet.  We discovered how closely the real Amsterdam is to the SL Amsterdam, and I was slightly disappointed. Amsterdam is a very cultural place both in real life and in SL, but I thought that the SL version lacked key components that Real Amsterdam has. I personally was responsible for finding some general background information on the real Amsterdam, and contrary to stereotypes of it being an outgoing culture (which it is) they have much more to offer to tourists than just alcohol, sex and drugs. I personally was ignorant to real Amsterdam culture and I thought that everyone there and everyone that went there just went there to get high and drunk (I was ridiculously ignorant, and apologize). They have many festivals and coffee shops that draw a significant amount of people there. Their festivals cover several aspects too, they have ones for films, paintings, photography, music and I am sure they have more to offer. Now that I know what the real Amsterdam has to offer I would be very excited to maybe one day travel there. 

In SL Amsterdam, we found that most of the island revolved around the sexual (red light district) and the loose drug policies of their culture. There were coffee shops there and traces of what may become a festival, but that festival and coffee shop aspect was pretty much nonexistent. I found that unfortunate, but that is the beauty in having a person design the island, they focus on what they want to, that maybe the best aspect of Amsterdam in the eyes of the creator of SL Amsterdam. There is also one museum in Amsterdam, but you can only get into it at certain times. While we were investigating we did not really keep this in mind, but when we were exploring at a different time we found that it was open. So while exploring SL keep in mind the time difference, it probably would have helped us research that museum more. Overall, there are several things to do in SL and real Amsterdam.